Inerrant Lie #22

Another lie from "God's ineffable, inerrant word":

The anonymous writer of Hebrews, in expounding upon the “greatness” of Melchisedec, writes: "And as I may so say, Levi also, who receiveth tithes, payed tithes in Abraham. For [Levi] was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him [Hebrews 7:9 & 10]." And as I may so say, sperm swimmers have no loins; much less loins- of- loins- of- Levi. Levi was most certainly not in Abe's loins, at any time. Isaac was a swimmer in Abe's loins. Later, Jacob was a swimmer in Isaac's loins. Even later, Levi was a swimmer in Jacob's loins.

To say Levi was swimming in Abe's loins the day Abe met Melchisedec is to call Jacob's loins Abe's loins. [This reeks of penis- envy.] If a man's loins are not his own, but rather belong to his ancestors and descendants: both Abe's and Melchisec's loins are really Adam's loins, aren't they? Thus, Adam paid homage to himself, what time Abe paid tithes to Melchisedec, by the reasoning of Hebrews' anonymous author. Did Melchisedec's and Abraham's loins “greet each other with an holy kiss?” They met in Sodom [Genesis 14].

This begs the question: Why does no one-- in the scriptures or otherwise-- praise the greatness of Esau, of whom Jacob said, "I have seen thy face, as though I had seen the face of God [Genesis 33:10f & g]," the same day Levi paid tithes and homage to Esau in person– not simply as a swimmer, swimming in a swimmer, swimming in a swimmer, swimming in a patriarch. If the writer of Hebrews' yardstick on Melchisedec’s greatness is valid: Esau must be God.

Inerrant Lie #20

Another lie from "God's ineffable, inerrant word":

The writer of Hebrews tells on himself a number of times. His description of "Melchisedec, king of Salem" is one such. In chapter 7, verse 3, the anonymous author of Hebrews describes Melchisedec as being "Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God..."

Though this may be somewhat gratuitous, it may nonetheless bear mentioning that, according to the writer of Hebrews: “Our Father which art in heaven" is not Melchisedec's father. He has no father.

Likewise, though even Adam has a mother-- being born of the womb of the Earth-- Melchisedec has no mother, according to Hebrews. He's a motherless bastard.

Considering where “Abraham” (Abram) crossed Melchisedec's path (in company with Sodom, Gomorrah, and the cities of the Salt Valley -Genesis 14), it's perhaps understandable and self- explanatory as to why Melchisedec had no descendants. Sodomy engenders sorcery, not children. The writer of Hebrews’ assertion that Melchisedec had no descendants means Melchisedec couldn't be God– who already had many sons “When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy [Job 38:7];” though Jesus of Nazareth was not yet begotten.

The lie in question comes about when 'Anonymous' says of Melchisedec that, though he had "neither beginning of days, nor end of life," he was nonetheless "made.” While it remains to be seen how many of the things created have an "end of life," absolutely everything "made" has a "beginning of days." Was Melchisedec a figment of his own imagination, or someone else's?

Inerrant Lie #2

Another lie from "God's ineffable, inerrant word":

Are there lies in "God's inerrant word?" Considering the uberfascist, Christ- murdering “thieves and robbers” who wrote it, would it be "inerrant" if there were none? You don't expect the Devil to tell the truth, do you? Why would his children [John 8:44 & 56] be more truthful than he? Isn't it far more likely the children of the Devil are less- truthful than their father?

For instance, an "angel of the Lord [Genesis 22:2]," lies in calling Isaac "[Abe's] only son," a lie retold in Hebrews 11:17 where the writer thereof calls him Abe's "only begotten son," at once rendering the lie more messianic and more laughable than the angel's deception in Genesis.

Isaac was not Abe's only son. Isaac was Sarah's only son. Ishmael (Abe's firstborn by Hagar, his second wife) was thirteen years old when Isaac was born of Sarah, Abe's first wife. Ishmael was not only born before Isaac: he was also circumcised before Isaac was born. It's just patently false to say Isaac was Abe's only son, yet "God's ineffable, inerrant word" does so twice. That's an adamant lie. From "'God's' ineffable, inerrant word."

Was Abe “dragged- out” in Sarah's dress, jewels, and do- me pumps when "that God" made his Crucify- Your- Christ- on-  Calvary deal with “the father of us all?” That would explain everything in Genesis 22.